Loading...
Aerial Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment – California v. Ciraolo
Corse, John
Corse, John
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract
Law enforcement officials have increasingly turned to aerial surveillance as a means of combating crime. Aerial surveillance often enables police to view areas that they otherwise would be unable to view without a warrant. Consequently, considerable conflict has developed over whether this means of surveillance constitutes a search under the fourth amendment. In California v. Ciraolo, the United States Supreme Court held that naked-eye aerial observations of the curtilage of a home, when made from navigable airspace, do not constitute a search protected by the fourth amendment.
Description
This is the published version.
Date
1987-01-01
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Kansas School of Law, Criminal Justice Clinic
Collections
Archive Status
This item contains archived web content.