Loading...
Suspension of Debtor Countries' Voting Rights in the IMF: An Assessment of the Third Amendment to the IMF Charter
Head, John W.
Head, John W.
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract
Two conclusions emerge from an examination of the Third Amendment to the IMF Charter, which was approved in 1992 to introduce a new form of sanction against countries failing to repay the IMF. First, going to the effort of formally amending the IMF Charter was preferable as a legal matter to suggesting that the IMF has an implied power to suspend a member country's voting rights. Hence the IMF could not have legally imposed such a suspension without an amendment to its charter. Second, the Third Amendment was, from a different perspective, neither necessary nor wise. Adding the threat of suspension to the various forms of rebuke already at the disposal of the IMF seems unlikely to persuade recalcitrant countries to clear their arrears to the IMF. Nor does the new suspension power offer any means of overcoming the deeper economic and political problems that underlie those arrears. In short, the Third Amendment represents only a reaction to the problem of growing arrears to the IMF, not a solution to it.
Description
Date
1993
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Virginia School of Law
Files
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
International monetary fund, IMF, International law, International organizations, North-south tensions, Global economy
Citation
John W. Head, Suspension of Debtor Countries' Voting Rights in the IMF: An Assessment of the Third Amendment to the IMF Charter, 33 Virginia Journal of International Law 591-646 (1993).