Loading...
Corrosion Performance of Poorly Pickled Stainless Steel Reinforcement
O’Reilly, Matthew Sperry, Jayne Darwin, David Lafikes, James Somogie, Isaac Storm, Scott Browning, JoAnn
O’Reilly, Matthew
Sperry, Jayne
Darwin, David
Lafikes, James
Somogie, Isaac
Storm, Scott
Browning, JoAnn
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract
XM-28 (UNS S24100) and 2304 (UNS S32304) stainless steel reinforcing bars with different levels of pickling were evaluated for
corrosion resistance using the rapid macrocell and cracked beam tests outlined in ASTM A955. Two heats of XM-28 from the same
producer were evaluated using the rapid macrocell test. A single heat of 2304 was evaluated in two conditions; as-received from
the manufacturer and re-pickled using both ASTM A955 tests. The poorly pickled heat of XM-28 reinforcement failed the rapid macrocell test with a peak individual corrosion rate exceeding 16 µm/y, while the properly pickled heat passed with no significant corrosion measured. The poorly pickled 2304 reinforcing steel failed the macrocell and cracked beam tests, with peak corrosion rates of 1.07 and 6.48 µm/y, respectively, while upon re-pickling, the same heat of steel passed both tests. These results suggest the need for a method to verify that the pickling process has been performed properly. Performance during the first week of the rapid macrocell tests or requiring that the bars exhibit a bright, shiny, uniformly light surface represent two potential methods for establishing the adequacy of pickling.
Description
Date
2017-11-01
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Concrete Institute
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Chlorides, Corrosion, Microcell, Pickling, Stainless steel
Citation
O’Reilly, M., Sperry, J., Darwin, D., Lafikes, J., Somogie, I., Storm, S., & Browning, J. (2017). Corrosion Performance of Poorly Pickled Stainless Steel Reinforcement. ACI Materials Journal, 114(6). doi:10.14359/51701008