Thumbnail Image
Publication

Arbitration Law's Separability Doctrine After Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna

Ware, Stephen J.
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract
The recent case of Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, is only the second Supreme Court decision applying the separability doctrine and it comes nearly forty years after the Court's first separability decision, Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Manufacturing Co. Arbitration's tremendous growth during those forty years - and the arrival of Buckeye - make this an opportune time to assess the current state of the separability doctrine. In doing that, this Article will analyze Prima Paint and Buckeye and discuss the separability issues they leave unresolved. Finally, this Article will critique the separability doctrine and call for its repeal by Congress.
Description
Date
2007
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada
Collections
Law School Scholarly Works
Show all metadata
Files
Thumbnail Image
Ware_8NevadaLJ107(2007).pdf
Adobe PDF, 139.26 KB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Arbitration
Citation
Stephen J. Ware, Arbitration Law's Separability Doctrine After Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 8 Nevada Law Journal 107-134 (2007).
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1808/7447
DOI
Embedded videos