Arbitration and Unconscionability After Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto

Ware, Stephen J.

Publication

Arbitration and Unconscionability After Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto

Ware, Stephen J.

Abstract

In Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto, the Supreme Court again endorsed a contractual approach to arbitration law. In particular, the Court requires lower courts to apply contract law principles when determining whether arbitration agreements are unconscionable. However, the Court did not explain how the unconscionability doctrine would actually be applied to typical arbitration cases. The author here picks up where the Court left off and in so doing advocates the contractual approach over competing approaches to issues of unconscionability in arbitration.