Loading...
Shaming in and into Argumentation
Innocenti, Beth
Innocenti, Beth
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract
Shame appeals may be both relevant to and make possible argumentation with reluctant addressees. I propose a normative pragmatic model of practical reasoning involved in shame appeals and show that its explanatory power exceeds that of a more traditional account of an underlying practical inference structure. I also illustrate that analyzing the formal propriety of shame appeals offers a more complete explanation of their normative pragmatic force than an application of rules for dialogue types.
Description
This is the author's accepted manuscript. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com.
Date
2007
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Citation
Manolescu, Beth Innocenti. "Shaming in and into Argumentation." Argumentation 21 (2007): 379-95.