Enzyme nomenclature: Functional or structural?
Issue Date
2000-12Author
Gegenheimer, Peter Albert
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Type
Article
Article Version
Scholarly/refereed, publisher version
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Altman and colleagues (this issue) call attention to the inability of current standardized enzyme nomenclature to distinguish between enzymatic activities that reside in nonhomologous macromolecules. This issue is highlighted by the fact that the pre-tRNA 5′-maturation activities of bacteria and plant chloroplasts present the first instance (of which I am aware) of two naturally occurring enzymes that cannot be evolutionarily related, but which catalyze an identical reaction. (In the classic example of convergent evolution between the trypsin family and subtilisin, the enzymes do not have an identical substrate specificity.) Altman and colleagues propose that a single trivial name be used only for members of a family of homologous macromolecules; in other words, that different trivial names be given to enzymes that catalyze the same precursor–product conversion but do so with different catalytic mechanisms, or which are not members of a single family of homologous macromolecules.
Description
This is the published version. Copyright 2000 by the RNA Society.
Collections
Citation
Gegenheimer, Peter. "Enzyme Nomenclature: Functional or Structural?" Rna 6.12 (2000): 1695-697. <http://rnajournal.cshlp.org/content/6/12/1695>.
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.