A deontológiai prioritás: Gondolatrokonság Ny. F. Fjodorov és a »korai szlavofilizmus« képviselői között
Issue Date
2014-02-03Author
Medzibrodszky, Alexandra
Type
Article
Article Version
Scholarly/refereed, publisher version
Rights
All articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
N. F. Fedorov (1829–1903) je eden najbolj izvirnih ruskih mislecev
vseh časov, kljub temu da je bil v sovjetskem obdobju praktično nepoznan.
Zgodnji slovanofilski misleci, kot so na primer Aleksei Homyakov,
Ivan Kireevski in Konstantin Aksakov, so pogosto omenjeni
kot možni vplivi na Fedorova, čeprav njihova intelektualna podobnost
še ni bila podrobno analizirana. Članek izpostavlja podobne tematske
ideje Fedorova in zgodnjih slovanofilov, hkrati pa preučuje posebno,
idealistično rabo terminologije, ki je značilna za vse navedene mislece
in ki ne poudarja ontologije – kar obstaja ali je obstajalo, temveč
deontologijo – kar bi moralo obstajati.
N. F. Fedorov (1829–1903) is considered to be one of the most original
Russian thinkers of all time, although he was virtually unknown
during the Soviet period. “Early Slavophile” thinkers, i.e., Aleksei
Khomyakov, Ivan Kireevski and Konstantin Aksakov are frequently
mentioned as possible influences on Fedorov, but their intellectual
similitude has not been thoroughly analyzed. This paper identifies
similar thematic ideas between Fedorov and the early Slavophiles
and also examines the particular “idealistic” use of terminology that
characterizes all of these thinkers and which puts emphasis not on
ontology, i.e., on what exists or existed, but on the sphere of deontology,
i.e., on what should exist.
ISSN
2385-8753Collections
Citation
http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/SCN.1808.12921
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.