Neurobiology and Patenting Thought
Issue Date
2009Author
Torrance, Andrew W.
Publisher
University of New Hampshire School of Law
Type
Article
Version
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1546089
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Many have argued that thought should constitute per se unpatentable subject matter, and some have even suggested that any patent claim that includes a mental step should lie outside patentability. Many courts have long disagreed with such a draconian rule, and have instead upheld myriad patent claims that include mental steps. Recently there has been renewed interest in the venerable Mental Steps Doctrine, and in patents claiming thoughts or aspects of thoughts, by the courts, including, most notably, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. Insights from neurobiology about how to differentiate categories of thought can offer useful criteria for deciding between patentable and unpatentable mental steps, and for setting more coherent and defensible boundaries on the patenting of thought. In particular, this article argues that thoughts subject to "executive control" should be situated more towards the patentable end of the spectrum, whereas "default thoughts" should be situated closer to the unpatentable end of the spectrum. This schema represents somewhat of a departure from the traditional view that First Amendment interests should privilege sophisticated, expressive thought by protecting it from patentability. Nevertheless, it accords well with Thirteenth Amendment interests, privileging thoughts that cannot be avoided by protecting them from patentability, and thus preventing the iniquity of involuntary patent servitude.
Description
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.
Collections
Citation
Andrew W. Torrance, Neurobiology and Patenting Thought, 50 IDEA 27 (2009).
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Gene Concepts, Gene Talk, and Gene Patents
Torrance, Andrew W. (University of Minnesota Law School, 2010)Since the existence of a discrete unit of heredity was first proposed by Gregor Mendel, scientific concepts of the “gene” have undergone rapid evolution. Beyond obvious epistemic and operational importance to the scientific ... -
All Patents Great and Small: A Big Data Network Approach to Valuation
Torrance, Andrew W.; West, Jevin (Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 2017)Measuring patent value is an important goal of scholars in both patent law and patent economics. However, doing so objectively, accurately, and consistently has proved exceedingly difficult. At least part of the reason for ... -
Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Patents: One Experimental View of the Cathedral
Tomlinson, Bill; Torrance, Andrew W. (Yale Law School, 2011)In their seminal 1972 article, "Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral," Guido Calabresi and A. Douglas Melamed proposed an analytic framework for comparing entitlements protected ...