Gene Concepts, Gene Talk, and Gene Patents
Issue Date
2010Author
Torrance, Andrew W.
Publisher
University of Minnesota Law School
Type
Article
Version
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1604606
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Since the existence of a discrete unit of heredity was first proposed by Gregor Mendel, scientific concepts of the “gene” have undergone rapid evolution. Beyond obvious epistemic and operational importance to the scientific community, changing gene concepts have exerted strong effects on institutions such as medicine, the biotechnology industry, politics, and the law. A particularly rich example of this is the interplay between gene concepts and patent law. Over the last century, biology has elaborated gene concepts that variously emphasized genes as discretely material, genes as information, and genes as extremely complex. By contrast, patent law has steadily adhered to a simpler, more stable concept of the gene since the advent of gene patents in the late 1970s. In fact, while the biology community has increasingly engaged in vigorous internal debate regarding the gene’s complexity and uncertainty, it has tended simultaneously to emphasize the simplicity and certainty of the gene to constituencies outside the biology community, most notably the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Federal courts. Rather than allow gene concepts to become contested by constituencies outside biology, the biology community appears to have used its authority to maintain a portrayal of the gene that facilitates the appropriation of rents from genes through the patent system. This use of “gene talk” has undergirded the growth of biotechnology into a powerful industry that has economically rewarded investors, academic institutions, and biologists. Not only may gene talk have facilitated the patenting of genes, but the prominence of gene patents describing a relatively simpler gene concept may have fed back into biological science to promote a simpler, and more patentable, concept of the gene even among members of the biology community.
Description
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.
Collections
Citation
Andrew W. Terrance, Gene Concepts, Gene Talk, and Gene Patents, 11 MINN. J. L. SCI. & TECH. 157 (2010).
Items in KU ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
We want to hear from you! Please share your stories about how Open Access to this item benefits YOU.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
All Patents Great and Small: A Big Data Network Approach to Valuation
Torrance, Andrew W.; West, Jevin (Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 2017)Measuring patent value is an important goal of scholars in both patent law and patent economics. However, doing so objectively, accurately, and consistently has proved exceedingly difficult. At least part of the reason for ... -
Neurobiology and Patenting Thought
Torrance, Andrew W. (University of New Hampshire School of Law, 2009)Many have argued that thought should constitute per se unpatentable subject matter, and some have even suggested that any patent claim that includes a mental step should lie outside patentability. Many courts have long ... -
Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Patents: One Experimental View of the Cathedral
Tomlinson, Bill; Torrance, Andrew W. (Yale Law School, 2011)In their seminal 1972 article, "Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral," Guido Calabresi and A. Douglas Melamed proposed an analytic framework for comparing entitlements protected ...