KU ScholarWorks >
Linguistics >
Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics >
Volume 26 (2002), KWPL >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1808/586
View usage statistics

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPye, Clifton-
dc.date.accessioned2005-08-16T18:43:28Z-
dc.date.available2005-08-16T18:43:28Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.issn1043-3805-
dc.identifier.issn1043-3805-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/586-
dc.description.abstractThis paper assesses predictions for the acquisition of Mayan verbal inflections derived from structural, comparative and metrical theories. The structuralist theory of Wexler (1998) fails to predict K'iche' (Kiche) children's use of the language's agreement morphology and existential verb. A comparison of verbal inflection across the Mayan languages successfully predicts the children's early use of the status suffixes on verbs, but fails to predict the relative acquisition of the ergative and absolutive agreement affixes. Demuth's metrical theory (1994) is the most successful of these three models in predicting the course of language development in K'iche' It is the only model that can explain why children would break morphemes along syllable boundaries as well as combine separate inflections into a single unit of production.en
dc.format.extent1772072 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas. Linguisitcs Graduate Student Associationen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesKansas Working Papers in Linguistics;-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesKansas Working Papers in Linguistics;-
dc.titleTHE ACQUISITION OF MAYAN MORPHOSYNTAXen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Volume 26 (2002), KWPL

Files in this Item:

File Description SizeFormat
ling.wp.v26.paper2.pdf1.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open