KU ScholarWorks >
Linguistics >
Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics >
Volume 20 (1995), KWPL >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1808/444
View usage statistics

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorALIDOU, OUSSEINA-
dc.date.accessioned2005-05-26T19:07:47Z-
dc.date.available2005-05-26T19:07:47Z-
dc.date.issued1995-
dc.identifier.issn1043-3805-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/444-
dc.description.abstractMcCarthy and Prince (1986, 1990) have put forward the Prosodic Morphology Hypothesis to account for morphological processes (such as reduplication and truncation) that typically require that their output conform to a particular shape of template. This hypothesis claims that morphological templates are analyzable in terms of prosodic units. In this paper I will show that Hausa nominal reduplication and nickname formation are best analyzed as involving the specification of a foot template. Thus, these two processes provide supporting evidence for McCarthy and Prince's Prosodic Morphology Hypothesis.en
dc.format.extent2594259 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherUniversity of Kansas. Linguistics Graduate Student Associationen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesKansas Working Papers in Linguistics;-
dc.titleEVIDENCE FOR FOOT STRUCTURE IN HAUSAen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Volume 20 (1995), KWPL

Files in this Item:

File Description SizeFormat
ling.wp.v20.paper1.pdf2.53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open