KU ScholarWorks >
School of Business >
School of Business Articles >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1808/168
View usage statistics

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBielza, Concha-
dc.contributor.authorShenoy, Prakash P.-
dc.date.accessioned2004-12-18T22:44:02Z-
dc.date.available2004-12-18T22:44:02Z-
dc.date.issued1999-11-
dc.identifier.citationBielza, C. and P. P. Shenoy, "A Comparison of Graphical Techniques for Asymmetric Decision Problems," Management Science, Vol. 45, No. 11, 1999, pp. 1552--1569.en
dc.identifier.issn0025-1909-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1808/168-
dc.description.abstractWe compare four graphical techniques for representation and solution of asymmetric decision problems—decision trees, influence diagrams, valuation networks, and sequential decision diagrams. We solve a modified version of Covaliu and Oliver’s Reactor problem using each of the four techniques. For each technique, we highlight the strengths, weaknesses, and some open issues that perhaps can be resolved with further research.en
dc.format.extent584103 bytes-
dc.format.extent323756 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.publisherInstitute For Operations Research and Management Sciencesen
dc.subjectAsymmetric decision problemsen
dc.subjectDecision treesen
dc.subjectInfluence diagramsen
dc.subjectValuation networksen
dc.subjectSequential decision diagramsen
dc.titleA Comparison of Graphical Techniques for Asymmetric Decision Problemsen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:School of Business Articles

Files in this Item:

File Description SizeFormat
MS99.pdfMain article316.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
MS99Supplement.pdfSupplement to main article570.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open