KU ScholarWorks >
School of Business >
School of Business Articles >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1808/155
View usage statistics

Title: A Comparison of Methods for Transforming Belief Function Models to Probability Models
Authors: Cobb, Barry R.
Shenoy, Prakash P.
Keywords: Dempster-Shafer belief functions
pignistic transformation method
plausibility transformation method
Transforming belief function models to probability models
Issue Date: Jul-2003
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Extent: 1245764 bytes
Type: Book chapter
Citation: Cobb, B. R. and P. P. Shenoy (2003), "A Comparison of Methods for Transforming Belief Function Models to Probability Models," in T. D. Nielsen and N. L. Zhang (eds.), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence No. 2711, pp. 255--266, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Series/Report no.: Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence;No. 2711
Abstract: Recently, we proposed a new method called the plausibility transformation method to convert a belief function model to an equivalent probability model. In this paper, we compare the plausibility transformation method with the pignistic transformation method. The two transformation methods yield qualitatively diĀ®erent probability models. We argue that the plausibility transformation method is the correct method for translating a belief function model to an equivalent probability model that maintains belief function semantics.
Description: This 12-pp paper is extracted from a longer unpublished working paper: "On Transforming Belief Function Models to Probability Models," School of Business Working Paper No. 293, July 2003, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1808/155
ISBN: 3-540-40494-5
ISSN: 0302-9743
Appears in Collections:School of Business Articles

Files in this Item:

File Description SizeFormat
ECSQARU03.pdf1.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open